Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLAX
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLAX
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a StrongBuy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. RYLAX (6.17M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLAX (0.07) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.69 vs. RYLAX (-5.72). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -4.77 vs. FSCPX (-8.05).
| FSCPX | RYLAX | FSCPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.68 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.890 | -2.847 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 887M | 6.17M | 14,376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | -5.72 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.51 | 24.58 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.05 | -4.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.07 | 54.62 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement