Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLAX
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLAX
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 713M vs. RYLAX (4.82M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLAX (0.07) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.12 vs. FSCPX (-12.43). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -6.59 vs. FSCPX (-13.39).
| FSCPX | RYLAX | FSCPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.69 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.156 | -5.670 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 713M | 4.82M | 14,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.07 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.43 | -10.12 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.42 | 26.50 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.39 | -6.59 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.33 | 53.62 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement