FSEA
Price
$9.96
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
42.93M
GLBZ
Price
$5.76
Change
+$0.08 (+1.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.82M
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSEA vs GLBZ

Header iconFSEA vs GLBZ Comparison
Open Charts FSEA vs GLBZBanner chart's image
First Seacoast Ban
Price$9.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.39K
Capitalization42.93M
Glen Burnie Ban
Price$5.76
Change+$0.08 (+1.41%)
Volume$4.96K
Capitalization15.82M
FSEA vs GLBZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEA vs. GLBZ commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEA is a Hold and GLBZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FSEA: $9.96 vs. GLBZ: $5.76)
Brand notoriety: FSEA and GLBZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEA: 40% vs. GLBZ: 88%
Market capitalization -- FSEA: $42.93M vs. GLBZ: $15.82M
FSEA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $42.93M. GLBZ’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSEA and GLBZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLBZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLBZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the short-term than GLBZ.

Price Growth

FSEA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.21% price change this week, while GLBZ (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSEA is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2023.

GLBZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSEA($42.9M) has a higher market cap than GLBZ($15.8M). FSEA has higher P/E ratio than GLBZ: FSEA (35.97) vs GLBZ (10.70). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: -0.797 vs. GLBZ (-1.116). GLBZ has less debt than FSEA: GLBZ (30M) vs FSEA (44.9M). FSEA has higher revenues than GLBZ: FSEA (13.6M) vs GLBZ (12.9M).
FSEAGLBZFSEA / GLBZ
Capitalization42.9M15.8M272%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.797-1.11671%
P/E Ratio35.9710.70336%
Revenue13.6M12.9M105%
Total CashN/A1.97M-
Total Debt44.9M30M150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBZ: Fundamental Ratings
GLBZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSEAGLBZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBCIX8.430.18
+2.18%
RBC China Equity I
PCAOX81.400.76
+0.94%
Principal Capital Appreciation R3
TFFCX66.150.59
+0.90%
Touchstone Focused C
IDIVX18.860.14
+0.75%
Integrity Dividend Harvest A
BISCX22.640.09
+0.40%
UBS US Small Cap Growth P

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
N/A
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
HTBI - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
CPF - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More

GLBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBZ and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBZ and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBZ
1D Price
Change %
GLBZ100%
+1.49%
PBBK - GLBZ
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCOW - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
FSEA - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
FNWD - GLBZ
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More