Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs NWHJX
FSGEX vs NWHJX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs NWHJX
FSGEX vs NWHJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. NWHJX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and NWHJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.8B vs. NWHJX (303M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than NWHJX: FSGEX (2.66) vs NWHJX (2.14). FSGEX was incepted earlier than NWHJX: FSGEX (17 years) vs NWHJX (20 years). NWHJX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.36 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHJX: FSGEX (0) vs NWHJX (2000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.80 vs. NWHJX (24.20). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 60.81 vs. FSGEX (55.46).
| FSGEX | NWHJX | FSGEX / NWHJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.98 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.04 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.716 | 16.077 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.8B | 303M | 24,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 2.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.80 | 24.20 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 64.39 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.46 | 60.81 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.05 | 121.56 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement