Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs NWHJX
FSGEX vs NWHJX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs NWHJX
FSGEX vs NWHJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. NWHJX commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and NWHJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. NWHJX (307M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than NWHJX: FSGEX (2.63) vs NWHJX (2.16). FSGEX was incepted earlier than NWHJX: FSGEX (17 years) vs NWHJX (20 years). NWHJX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.36 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHJX: FSGEX (0) vs NWHJX (2000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.89 vs. NWHJX (23.42). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 64.04 vs. FSGEX (58.03).
| FSGEX | NWHJX | FSGEX / NWHJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.98 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.04 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.301 | 16.520 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 307M | 24,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.16 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.89 | 23.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.81 | 71.76 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.03 | 64.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.74 | 131.24 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement