Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNAX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RTNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. RTNAX (5.79B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: FSGEX (2.63) vs RTNAX (1.71). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNAX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RTNAX (11 years). RTNAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.46 vs. RTNAX (19.76). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 52.77 vs. RTNAX (33.64).
| FSGEX | RTNAX | FSGEX / RTNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.29 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.967 | 8.275 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 5.79B | 1,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.71 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.46 | 19.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.52 | 46.88 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.77 | 33.64 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.73 | 85.67 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement