Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RTNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. RTNAX (6.01B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: FSGEX (2.58) vs RTNAX (1.66). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNAX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RTNAX (11 years). RTNAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.72 vs. RTNAX (20.88). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.99 vs. RTNAX (36.81).
| FSGEX | RTNAX | FSGEX / RTNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.29 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.197 | 13.908 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 6.01B | 1,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 1.66 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.72 | 20.88 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.63 | 61.76 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.99 | 36.81 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.77 | 87.75 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement