Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNAX
FSGEX vs RTNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RTNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. RTNAX (5.98B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: FSGEX (2.64) vs RTNAX (1.69). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNAX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RTNAX (11 years). RTNAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. RTNAX (27.95). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.31 vs. RTNAX (34.00).
| FSGEX | RTNAX | FSGEX / RTNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.29 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 12.100 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 5.98B | 1,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.69 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.02 | 27.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.50 | 57.86 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.31 | 34.00 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.68 | 104.88 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement