Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGRX vs WCMLX
FSGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSGRX vs WCMLX
FSGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). FSGRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSGRX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSGRX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSGRX (16.31). FSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSGRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. FSGRX (16.96). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. FSGRX (-12.85).
| FSGRX | WCMLX | FSGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.99 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.835 | 9.375 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 52.4M | 4,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 25.84 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.90 | 32.13 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.85 | -0.07 | 19,345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement