FSK
Price
$19.64
Change
-$1.09 (-5.26%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
33 days until earnings call
GBDC
Price
$14.17
Change
-$0.65 (-4.39%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.84B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs GBDC

Header iconFSK vs GBDC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs GBDCBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$19.64
Change-$1.09 (-5.26%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization5.31B
Golub Capital BDC
Price$14.17
Change-$0.65 (-4.39%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization2.84B
FSK vs GBDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. GBDC commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and GBDC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.73 vs. GBDC: $14.82)
Brand notoriety: FSK and GBDC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 137% vs. GBDC: 136%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. GBDC: $2.84B
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. GBDC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGBDC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GBDC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than GBDC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBDC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GBDC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than GBDC.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while GBDC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

GBDC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-4.03% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than GBDC($2.84B). GBDC has higher P/E ratio than FSK: GBDC (9.09) vs FSK (7.65). GBDC YTD gains are higher at: 0.252 vs. FSK (-1.307). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. GBDC (65.6M). GBDC has less debt than FSK: GBDC (3.07B) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than GBDC: FSK (779M) vs GBDC (334M).
FSKGBDCFSK / GBDC
Capitalization5.31B2.84B187%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.3070.252-518%
P/E Ratio7.659.0984%
Revenue779M334M233%
Total Cash223M65.6M340%
Total Debt8.19B3.07B267%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs GBDC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
GBDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
633
SMR RATING
1..100
1113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1924
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (10). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (33). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (13). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (51). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (24). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKGBDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUMB20.150.04
+0.20%
First Trust Ultra Short Dur Muncpl ETF
BME38.15-0.27
-0.70%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
ASHR26.18-0.27
-1.02%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
UJUN32.15-1.28
-3.83%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
LRND30.63-1.48
-4.60%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

GBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBDC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBDC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBDC
1D Price
Change %
GBDC100%
-2.18%
ARCC - GBDC
68%
Closely correlated
-3.97%
FSK - GBDC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
MAIN - GBDC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
BCSF - GBDC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
FDUS - GBDC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More