AEM
Price
$160.16
Change
-$6.69 (-4.01%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
80.26B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSM
Price
$8.60
Change
-$0.45 (-4.97%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.61B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs FSM

AEM vs FSM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. FSM commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and FSM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $160.16 vs. FSM: $8.60)
Brand notoriety: AEM and FSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 122% vs. FSM: 72%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $80.26B vs. FSM: $2.61B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $80.26B. FSM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $10.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than FSM.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.91% price change this week, while FSM (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -11.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-11.01% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($80.3B) has a higher market cap than FSM($2.61B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than FSM: AEM (15.71) vs FSM (8.38). AEM YTD gains are higher at: -5.125 vs. FSM (-12.334). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.74B vs. FSM (743M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. FSM (676M). FSM has less debt than AEM: FSM (209M) vs AEM (319M). AEM has higher revenues than FSM: AEM (13.5B) vs FSM (1.09B).
AEMFSMAEM / FSM
Capitalization80.3B2.61B3,078%
EBITDA9.74B743M1,311%
Gain YTD-5.125-12.33442%
P/E Ratio15.718.38187%
Revenue13.5B1.09B1,234%
Total Cash3.12B676M462%
Total Debt319M209M153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs FSM: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
FSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1212
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4979
SMR RATING
1..100
4244
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8783
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (51) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (79) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (44) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (57) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (87) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPR69.272.00
+2.97%
ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Aln MLP ETN
MAYP32.18-0.17
-0.51%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May
HOYY5.89-0.04
-0.68%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF
NCZ15.59-0.33
-2.07%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II
CHAT96.37-7.70
-7.40%
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-4.97%
AEM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-4.01%
WPM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-4.32%
PAAS - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-5.50%
AGI - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
KGC - FSM
80%
Closely correlated
-4.90%
More