Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LCBSX
FSMAX vs LCBSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LCBSX
FSMAX vs LCBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LCBSX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LCBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LCBSX (3.29B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LCBSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LCBSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LCBSX (14 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LCBSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.54 vs. LCBSX (10.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. LCBSX (14.63).
| FSMAX | LCBSX | FSMAX / LCBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.006 | 8.146 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.29B | 1,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.54 | 10.30 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.92 | 53.98 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 14.63 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.51 | 309.56 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers