Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LCBSX
FSMAX vs LCBSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LCBSX
FSMAX vs LCBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LCBSX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LCBSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. LCBSX (3.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: FSMAX (0.48) vs LCBSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LCBSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LCBSX (14 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LCBSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. LCBSX (10.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. LCBSX (9.51).
| FSMAX | LCBSX | FSMAX / LCBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 4.874 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 3.3B | 1,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | 10.81 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | 43.73 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | 9.51 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | 336.59 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers