Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NNTWX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NNTWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NNTWX (907M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NNTWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NNTWX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NNTWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NNTWX (21 years). NNTWX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NNTWX (0.32). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NNTWX: FSMAX (0) vs NNTWX (500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.61 vs. NNTWX (-12.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.92 vs. NNTWX (-18.73).
| FSMAX | NNTWX | FSMAX / NNTWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.172 | 0.718 | 2,253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 907M | 4,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 2,246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.61 | -12.95 | -213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.63 | -3.12 | -2,293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.92 | -18.73 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.06 | 21.28 | 743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers