Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NNTWX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NNTWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NNTWX (958M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NNTWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NNTWX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NNTWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NNTWX (22 years). NNTWX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NNTWX (0.32). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NNTWX: FSMAX (0) vs NNTWX (500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.85 vs. NNTWX (-7.32). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. NNTWX (-17.35).
| FSMAX | NNTWX | FSMAX / NNTWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.334 | 8.363 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 958M | 4,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 2,391% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.85 | -7.32 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.50 | 4.37 | 1,635% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | -17.35 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.98 | 20.73 | 656% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers