Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMGX
FSMAX vs TCMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMGX
FSMAX vs TCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMGX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TCMGX (628M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TCMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TCMGX (24 years). TCMGX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMGX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. TCMGX (-14.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. TCMGX (-34.84).
| FSMAX | TCMGX | FSMAX / TCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.874 | 0.634 | 2,505% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 628M | 6,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | -14.91 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.96 | 7.99 | 851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | -34.84 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.32 | 0.37 | 37,253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement