Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VIMCX
FSMAX vs VIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VIMCX
FSMAX vs VIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VIMCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and VIMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. VIMCX (1.83B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VIMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VIMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VIMCX (17 years). VIMCX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VIMCX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMCX: FSMAX (0) vs VIMCX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. VIMCX (-5.11). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. VIMCX (4.08).
| FSMAX | VIMCX | FSMAX / VIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | -1.289 | -1,061% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.83B | 2,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | -5.11 | -598% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 13.38 | 535% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | 4.08 | 908% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 140.52 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers