Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$89.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$24.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. WMGAX (5B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. WMGAX (-7.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. WMGAX (-19.03).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.23 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.540 | -1.075 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 5B | 753% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | -7.76 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | -11.53 | -281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.40 | -19.03 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.19 | 6.20 | 1,117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement