Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.12
Change+$0.54 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$26.82
Change+$0.14 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.67B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. WMGAX (4.67B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.46) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. WMGAX (0.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.94 vs. WMGAX (-21.90).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.23 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.473 | 6.768 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 4.67B | 848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.07 | 0.15 | 10,762% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.49 | -3.46 | -1,345% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.94 | -21.90 | -237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.25 | 23.71 | 414% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers