Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.16
Change+$0.81 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$26.10
Change+$0.22 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.97B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. WMGAX (4.97B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.47) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. WMGAX (-1.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.12 vs. WMGAX (-18.08).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.23 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.818 | 3.025 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 4.97B | 790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | -1.71 | -1,073% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.55 | -2.34 | -2,118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.12 | -18.08 | -338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.50 | 11.55 | 688% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers