Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$79.49
Change+$1.44 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$22.05
Change+$0.45 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. WMGAX (4.57B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.53) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. WMGAX (-18.00). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. WMGAX (-15.56).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.23 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.118 | -14.013 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 4.57B | 798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -18.00 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | -26.46 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | -15.56 | -405% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | -9.81 | -466% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...