Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.54
Change-$1.22 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$26.23
Change-$0.23 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.46B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. WMGAX (4.46B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.58 vs. WMGAX (-4.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.17 vs. WMGAX (-25.34).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.23 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 5.334 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 4.46B | 928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.58 | -4.30 | -455% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.02 | 4.05 | 1,729% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.17 | -25.34 | -210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.23 | 23.13 | 464% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement