Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. WMGAX (3.03B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WMGAX (26 years). WMGAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.99 vs. WMGAX (-3.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.99 vs. WMGAX (-40.24).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.685 | 4.291 | 366% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 3.03B | 1,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.99 | -3.91 | -767% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.09 | -12.17 | -568% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.99 | -40.24 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.87 | 22.78 | 658% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers