Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZCX
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZCX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$50.73
Change-$0.99 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.09M
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FTZCX (213M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FTZCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FTZCX (4 years). FTZCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZCX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZCX (1000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. FSMDX (10.03).
| FSMDX | FTZCX | FSMDX / FTZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.84 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | 1.278 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 213M | 18,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 10.84 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 65.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.33 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement