Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOFX
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.13
Change-$0.31 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
Price$19.73
Change-$0.24 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. LVOFX (1.13B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs LVOFX (0.11). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOFX (18 years). LVOFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. LVOFX (-1.79). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.20 vs. LVOFX (17.21).
| FSMDX | LVOFX | FSMDX / LVOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 0.612 | 1,670% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 1.13B | 3,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.11 | 1,190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | -1.79 | -791% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 11.65 | 387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.20 | 17.21 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.17 | 1.49 | 9,485% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement