Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFNX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and RYFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. RYFNX (23.3M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFNX: FSPCX (1.80) vs RYFNX (1.34). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFNX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFNX (22 years). RYFNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFNX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFNX (2500). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. RYFNX (5.10). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.52 vs. RYFNX (15.49).
| FSPCX | RYFNX | FSPCX / RYFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.571 | 4.845 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 23.3M | 2,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.34 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 5.10 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.96 | 54.06 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.52 | 15.49 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.75 | 96.84 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers