Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFNX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Buy and RYFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. RYFNX (23.9M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFNX: FSPCX (1.70) vs RYFNX (1.26). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFNX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFNX (22 years). RYFNX (1.73) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFNX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFNX (2500). RYFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. FSPCX (5.91). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.10 vs. RYFNX (14.67).
| FSPCX | RYFNX | FSPCX / RYFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.040 | 7.393 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 23.9M | 2,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.26 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 7.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 64.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.10 | 14.67 | 341% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.53 | 101.59 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement