Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFNX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Hold and RYFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. RYFNX (11.9M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFNX: FSPCX (1.80) vs RYFNX (1.37). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFNX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFNX (22 years). RYFNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFNX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFNX (2500). RYFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. FSPCX (-0.78). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.33 vs. RYFNX (11.09).
| FSPCX | RYFNX | FSPCX / RYFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.168 | 0.948 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 11.9M | 5,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.37 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.78 | 3.84 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.15 | 55.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.33 | 11.09 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.54 | 97.76 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement