Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs RYFNX
FSPCX vs RYFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. RYFNX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Buy and RYFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 635M vs. RYFNX (21.9M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than RYFNX: FSPCX (1.69) vs RYFNX (1.27). FSPCX was incepted earlier than RYFNX: FSPCX (41 years) vs RYFNX (22 years). RYFNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). RYFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFNX: FSPCX (0) vs RYFNX (2500). RYFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. FSPCX (7.84). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.46 vs. RYFNX (14.76).
| FSPCX | RYFNX | FSPCX / RYFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.772 | 8.268 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 635M | 21.9M | 2,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.27 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 9.72 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.36 | 66.14 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.46 | 14.76 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | 102.88 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement