Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HGHCX (801M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHCX (25 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHCX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. HGHCX (-19.39). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.93 vs. HGHCX (-28.25).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -6.226 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 801M | 732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -19.39 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | -9.58 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -28.25 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | -37.62 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement