Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. HGHCX (831M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHCX (25 years). HGHCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. HGHCX (-14.66). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.01 vs. HGHCX (-23.41).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.05 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.05 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.083 | -5.416 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 831M | 772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.80 | -14.66 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.54 | -12.16 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.01 | -23.41 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.24 | -35.45 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...