Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. HGHCX (895M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHCX (25 years). HGHCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. HGHCX (-12.19). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. HGHCX (-4.89).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.05 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.05 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.064 | -0.469 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 895M | 717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -12.19 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.12 | -12.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | -4.89 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | -31.59 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...