Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and HGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. HGHCX (751M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHCX (25 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHCX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.13 vs. HGHCX (-23.44). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.58 vs. HGHCX (-31.02).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.349 | -4.435 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 751M | 764% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.13 | -23.44 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.33 | -6.70 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.58 | -31.02 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.20 | -36.08 | -48% |