Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHCX
FSPHX vs HGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. HGHCX (743M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHCX (25 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHCX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHCX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.35 vs. HGHCX (-20.81). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -18.11 vs. HGHCX (-32.65).
| FSPHX | HGHCX | FSPHX / HGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.092 | -7.804 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 743M | 772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.35 | -20.81 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.85 | -13.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.11 | -32.65 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.72 | -40.31 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement