Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHTX
FSPHX vs HGHTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs HGHTX
FSPHX vs HGHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHTX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. HGHTX (791M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHTX: FSPHX (0.39) vs HGHTX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHTX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHTX (20 years). HGHTX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. HGHTX (49.00). FSPHX (0) and HGHTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HGHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. FSPHX (11.51). HGHTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.14 vs. FSPHX (-12.94).
| FSPHX | HGHTX | FSPHX / HGHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.810 | 7.969 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 791M | 853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 24.90 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 25.75 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.94 | -2.14 | 604% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.61 | 36.98 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement