Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SBHIX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SBHIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. SBHIX (11.2M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SBHIX: FSPHX (0.41) vs SBHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SBHIX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SBHIX (23 years). SBHIX (2.60) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SBHIX (22.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHIX: FSPHX (0) vs SBHIX (250). SBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.13 vs. FSPHX (11.07). SBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.50 vs. FSPHX (-16.76).
| FSPHX | SBHIX | FSPHX / SBHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.889 | 6.692 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 11.2M | 56,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.07 | 23.13 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.58 | 17.71 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.76 | 13.50 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.60 | -15.03 | -257% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers