Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SBHIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SBHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. SBHIX (10.3M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SBHIX: FSPHX (0.45) vs SBHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SBHIX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SBHIX (23 years). SBHIX (2.60) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SBHIX (22.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHIX: FSPHX (0) vs SBHIX (250). SBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). SBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.04 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FSPHX | SBHIX | FSPHX / SBHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -2.476 | 584% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 10.3M | 56,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 10.47 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | 12.70 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | 9.04 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | -19.15 | -129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement