Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$19.96
Change-$0.22 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
Rydex Leisure H
Price$88.69
Change-$0.08 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.03M
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. RYLAX (14M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: RYLAX (0.46) vs FSRPX (0.12). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.66). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (39.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.43 vs. FSRPX (1.89). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. FSRPX (-4.56).
| FSRPX | RYLAX | FSRPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.63 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.417 | 10.713 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 14M | 19,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 23.43 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.83 | 49.67 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.56 | 34.74 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.74 | 79.94 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement