Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMBAX
FSSNX vs LMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMBAX
FSSNX vs LMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMBAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. LMBAX (140M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMBAX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LMBAX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMBAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMBAX (17 years). LMBAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBAX: FSSNX (0) vs LMBAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. LMBAX (33.32). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. LMBAX (4.16).
| FSSNX | LMBAX | FSSNX / LMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.30 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.36 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 14.657 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 140M | 24,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.01 | 8,735% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 33.32 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 55.05 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | 4.16 | 807% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 44.97 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement