Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SMEAX
FSSNX vs SMEAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SMEAX
FSSNX vs SMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SMEAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. SMEAX (1.12B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SMEAX: FSSNX (1.05) vs SMEAX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SMEAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs SMEAX (26 years). SMEAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. SMEAX (60.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMEAX: FSSNX (0) vs SMEAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.47 vs. SMEAX (3.89). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.62 vs. SMEAX (-6.65).
| FSSNX | SMEAX | FSSNX / SMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.692 | 13.056 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 1.12B | 3,086% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.47 | 3.89 | 629% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 28.49 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.62 | -6.65 | -566% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.87 | 15.13 | 918% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement