Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TRHBX
FSSNX vs TRHBX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TRHBX
FSSNX vs TRHBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TRHBX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and TRHBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. TRHBX (4.03B). TRHBX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: TRHBX (1.14) vs FSSNX (1.05). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TRHBX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TRHBX (11 years). TRHBX (0.17) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. TRHBX (13.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRHBX: FSSNX (0) vs TRHBX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.47 vs. TRHBX (20.97). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.62 vs. TRHBX (17.52).
| FSSNX | TRHBX | FSSNX / TRHBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.17 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.17 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.692 | 18.580 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 4.03B | 856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.47 | 20.97 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 50.04 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.62 | 17.52 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.87 | 82.21 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement