Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRFX
FSTBX vs RIRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRFX
FSTBX vs RIRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a Buy and RIRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRFX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. FSTBX (293M). RIRFX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRFX (2.97) vs FSTBX (1.98). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRFX: FSTBX (57 years) vs RIRFX (24 years). FSTBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RIRFX (0.30). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRFX (50.00). RIRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRFX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). FSTBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. RIRFX (12.89). RIRFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. FSTBX (10.67).
| FSTBX | RIRFX | FSTBX / RIRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.30 | 383% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.30 | 477% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.671 | 7.284 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.97 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.26 | 12.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.81 | 42.79 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.67 | 41.40 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.50 | 83.92 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement