Ad is loading...
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$31.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. FSTKX (1.57B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.21) vs FSTKX (0.91). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. FSTKX (-2.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.68 vs. FSTKX (43.12).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 0.984 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 4.24 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.72 | 16.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 54.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.03 | 59.09 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...