Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$33.85
Change-$0.20 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTKX (1.84B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.11) vs FSTKX (0.81). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. FSTKX (8.01). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. FSTKX (38.08).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.776 | 9.293 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 10.92 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.58 | 25.02 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.08 | 53.14 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.98 | 74.65 | 43% |