Ad is loading...
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$31.78
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FSTKX (1.37B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.54) vs FSTKX (1.08). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. FSTKX (11.36). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. FSTKX (17.83).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.624 | 2.149 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.54 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.36 | 12.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.34 | 12.11 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.83 | 36.84 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.39 | 63.72 | 46% |