Ad is loading...
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$32.17
Change-$0.42 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FSTKX (1.52B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.54) vs FSTKX (1.08). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. FSTKX (7.36). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. FSTKX (20.58).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.211 | 4.809 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.54 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | 10.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.55 | 19.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.58 | 40.75 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.75 | 63.29 | 38% |