Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$32.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FSTKX (1.66B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.16) vs FSTKX (0.87). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. FSTKX (2.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. FSTKX (32.58).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.915 | 5.349 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | 8.30 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.85 | 17.96 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.58 | 49.85 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.85 | 68.21 | 39% |