Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYKX vs RNWBX
FSYKX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FSYKX vs RNWBX
FSYKX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSYKX (39.5M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than FSYKX: RNWBX (0.41) vs FSYKX (0.23). FSYKX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSYKX (4 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FSYKX (4.81) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FSYKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSYKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSYKX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSYKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.19 vs. RNWBX (29.69).
| FSYKX | RNWBX | FSYKX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.66 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.81 | 1.66 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.658 | 18.201 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.41 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.19 | 29.69 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.21 | 52.51 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 15.20 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement