Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYKX vs RNWBX
FSYKX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FSYKX vs RNWBX
FSYKX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSYKX (44.4M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than FSYKX: RNWBX (0.41) vs FSYKX (0.23). FSYKX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSYKX (4 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FSYKX (4.81) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FSYKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSYKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSYKX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSYKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.55 vs. RNWBX (18.14).
| FSYKX | RNWBX | FSYKX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.66 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.81 | 1.66 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.680 | 12.082 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.41 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.55 | 18.14 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.40 | 39.22 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 9.30 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement