Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYKX vs RNWHX
FSYKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSYKX vs RNWHX
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq C
Price$9.93
Change+$0.06 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$86.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.33B
FSYKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 68.3B vs. FSYKX (7.32M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSYKX: RNWHX (1.04) vs FSYKX (0.29). FSYKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSYKX (3 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). FSYKX (5.55) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSYKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). FSYKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSYKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSYKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. RNWHX (10.15).
| FSYKX | RNWHX | FSYKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.72 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.55 | 0.72 | 771% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.439 | 13.207 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32M | 68.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.04 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 10.15 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 31.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.19 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement