Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYKX vs RNWHX
FSYKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSYKX vs RNWHX
FSYKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSYKX (39.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSYKX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FSYKX (0.23). FSYKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSYKX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSYKX (4.81) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSYKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSYKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSYKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSYKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.19 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| FSYKX | RNWHX | FSYKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.72 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.81 | 0.72 | 668% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.658 | 18.743 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.15 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.19 | 31.15 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.21 | 57.37 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement