Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAAX vs HBLCX
FTAAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAAX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% A
Price$12.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
FTAAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAAX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FTAAX (2.03B). FTAAX (2.59) and HBLCX (2.58) have matching dividends . FTAAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTAAX (18 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FTAAX (0.79). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTAAX (19.00). FTAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTAAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTAAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTAAX (500). FTAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. HBLCX (1.21). FTAAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.42 vs. HBLCX (12.55).
| FTAAX | HBLCX | FTAAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.738 | 8.089 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 11.8B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.58 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 1.21 | 661% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 22.05 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.42 | 12.55 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.54 | 33.45 | 130% |