Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MFSCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. MFSCX (252M). MFSCX (3.57) and FTAZX (3.49) have matching dividends . FTAZX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FTAZX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.68). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FTAZX (17.42). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. FTAZX (4.16). MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. FTAZX (-2.34).
| FTAZX | MFSCX | FTAZX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.86 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.92 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.366 | -0.226 | 162% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 581M | 252M | 231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 4.45 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 10.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.34 | -0.44 | 527% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.68 | 10.57 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement