Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 608M vs. MFSCX (256M). MFSCX (3.45) and FTAZX (3.37) have matching dividends . FTAZX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FTAZX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FTAZX (17.42). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAZX (7.67) and MFSCX (7.60) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.59 vs. FTAZX (0.74).
| FTAZX | MFSCX | FTAZX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.485 | 2.554 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 608M | 256M | 238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 7.60 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 11.84 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.74 | 2.59 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.01 | 13.38 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement