Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MFSCX
FTAZX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 603M vs. MFSCX (252M). MFSCX (3.45) and FTAZX (3.37) have matching dividends . FTAZX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FTAZX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FTAZX (17.42). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAZX (8.22) and MFSCX (8.14) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.25 vs. FTAZX (0.36).
| FTAZX | MFSCX | FTAZX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.965 | 2.004 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 603M | 252M | 239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 8.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 11.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.36 | 2.25 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.86 | 14.14 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement