Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCS vs RECS
FTCS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FTCS vs RECS
FTCS vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCS vs. RECS commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCS is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCS has more net assets: 7.72B vs. RECS (5.73B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FTCS: RECS (5.950) vs FTCS (2.498). FTCS was incepted earlier than RECS: FTCS (20 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FTCS (0.53). FTCS has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| FTCS | RECS | FTCS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.498 | 5.950 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 7.72B | 5.73B | 135% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.15 | 353% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 32.00 | 366% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 0.74 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTCS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTCS has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTCS jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCS | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| SPGI - FTCS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| XYL - FTCS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| AMP - FTCS | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ECL - FTCS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| HD - FTCS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
More | ||||