In today's market, technology sector ETFs like FTEC and IGV offer distinct pathways to capture growth in information technology. FTEC provides comprehensive exposure to the U.S. tech sector, encompassing hardware, semiconductors, and software. IGV, by contrast, delivers targeted access to North American software firms and select interactive media companies. Investors compare them to balance broad diversification against concentrated bets on software innovation, amid AI-driven capital flows and evolving sector rotation. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences, exposure profiles, and relative positioning to aid informed allocation decisions in a dynamic tech landscape.
The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. technology equities. It holds approximately 286 stocks, providing broad sector coverage. Top holdings as of late April 2026 include NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.9%), and MU (2.6%), comprising about 59% of assets.
Sector allocation is overwhelmingly technology at 98.5%, with minor exposures to communication services (0.5%), financial services (0.5%), and industrials (0.4%). Subsector breakdowns emphasize semiconductors (around 42%), software (23%), and communications equipment (19%). The expense ratio is a low 0.08%, and AUM exceeds $19 billion, supporting strong liquidity. As a non-diversified, market-cap-weighted ETF launched in 2013, FTEC rebalances in line with the index methodology, offering cost-effective, comprehensive tech sector exposure without leverage or active management.
The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is a passively managed ETF tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, focusing on U.S.- and Canadian-listed software companies plus select interactive home entertainment and media services firms. It maintains around 111 holdings for targeted subsector exposure. Top holdings as of early May 2026 feature ORCL (9.7%), MSFT (8.2%), PLTR (7.3%), CRM (6.3%), and PANW (6.3%), accounting for nearly 59% of the portfolio.
Allocations break down into application software (58%), systems software (38%), interactive home entertainment (3%), and interactive media (0.3%). The expense ratio stands at 0.39%, with AUM over $13 billion and robust liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01%). Launched in 2001 as a non-diversified, market-cap-weighted fund, IGV follows index rebalancing to emphasize software innovation, distinguishing it as a thematic play within technology.
The technology sector, powering AI, cloud computing, and digital transformation, faces a landscape of surging capital expenditures (CapEx) from hyperscalers, projected to exceed $300 billion annually. Semiconductors and hardware benefit from AI infrastructure demand, while software firms navigate disruption from generative AI models. Regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and antitrust, alongside macroeconomic factors like interest rates and geopolitical tensions over chips, influences flows. Sector risks include valuation stretches and supply chain vulnerabilities, but catalysts like AI adoption and enterprise digitization sustain momentum across recent market cycles.
Over recent months, FTEC has demonstrated resilience, buoyed by semiconductor strength in holdings like NVDA and AVGO, amid AI hardware demand and sector rotation toward infrastructure. IGV, more sensitive to software repricing amid AI disruption concerns, has shown higher volatility with underperformance in recent weeks relative to broader tech. FTEC's diversification across subsectors tempers drawdowns, while IGV's concentration amplifies swings tied to SaaS growth cycles and earnings from top software names. Both exhibit tech beta above 1.0, but FTEC's broader exposure aligns with sustained CapEx trends, positioning it favorably in risk-adjusted terms during macro shifts.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Customizable filters span industry, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and hidden market opportunities. Explore the AI Screener today to streamline your research and identify high-potential ETF comparisons like FTEC and IGV.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (286 holdings), and balanced exposure across tech subsectors amid AI infrastructure momentum. While IGV offers compelling software purity, its higher costs and concentration elevate risk in volatile cycles. FTEC's structural advantages suggest a 65% probability of outperforming on a risk-adjusted basis over the next market cycle, absent major software rotations.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FTEC | IGV | FTEC / IGV | |
| Gain YTD | 24.403 | -15.624 | -156% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 14B | 147% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.39 | 22% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 20.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| FTEC | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBIC | 26.06 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term Tips ETF | |||
| AEF | 9.74 | -0.13 | -1.32% |
| abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc. | |||
| UNHW | 52.11 | -1.29 | -2.41% |
| Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| COSW | 42.20 | -1.12 | -2.58% |
| Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| SILJ | 28.59 | -1.10 | -3.70% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| NVDA - FTEC | 76% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| AVGO - FTEC | 69% Closely correlated | +4.30% | ||
| CEVA - FTEC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| AMAT - FTEC | 67% Closely correlated | +4.35% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | 100% | -2.42% | ||
| CRWD - IGV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CRM - IGV | 75% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| MSFT - IGV | 72% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| DSGX - IGV | 69% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| RBRK - IGV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||