FTEC
Price
$280.46
Change
+$2.67 (+0.96%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGV
Price
$101.85
Change
-$0.60 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs IGV

FTEC vs IGV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC provides broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector, including hardware, semiconductors, and software, while IGV targets a narrower software and select interactive media focus within North America.
  • FTEC maintains approximately 280 holdings with a very low expense ratio of 0.08%, offering cost-efficient diversification across the full technology value chain.
  • IGV holds around 110 securities and carries a higher expense ratio of 0.38%, reflecting its specialized software-industry strategy with greater concentration in application and systems software firms.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track market-capitalization-weighted indexes, but FTEC’s wider sector mandate reduces single-subsector risk compared with IGV’s software-centric approach.
  • Top holdings in FTEC emphasize mega-cap technology leaders such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT), whereas IGV weights software specialists more heavily, including Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW) and Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR).
  • Investors seeking broad technology-sector participation may prefer FTEC’s lower cost and diversification, while those targeting software innovation and growth may find IGV’s thematic focus more aligned with their objectives.

Introduction

Technology remains a dominant driver of equity market returns amid ongoing digital transformation, artificial intelligence adoption, and cloud computing expansion. The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) both deliver targeted technology exposure yet differ meaningfully in scope and construction. FTEC offers broad information technology sector coverage, whereas IGV narrows its mandate to software and select interactive media companies. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural distinctions, cost profiles, and positioning within the evolving technology landscape.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, providing exposure to U.S. companies classified within the information technology sector. The fund holds approximately 280–285 securities and maintains a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Its expense ratio stands at 0.08%. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Broadcom Inc (AVGO), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (TSM), together representing a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on information technology, encompassing semiconductors, hardware, software, and IT services. The fund’s broad mandate and low cost distinguish it as an efficient vehicle for diversified technology exposure.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, focusing on North American equities in the software industry and select interactive media and services sub-industries. The fund holds approximately 106–117 securities and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing and security weight caps. Its expense ratio is 0.38%. Prominent holdings often feature Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW), Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR), Adobe Inc (ADBE), and Salesforce Inc (CRM). Allocation concentrates in application software, systems software, and related categories, with minimal exposure outside technology and communication services. IGV’s narrower software emphasis and higher fee reflect its specialized thematic objective.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure, enterprise cloud migration, and cybersecurity enhancements. Software companies have experienced robust demand as businesses accelerate digital initiatives, while broader information technology firms navigate semiconductor supply dynamics and hardware refresh cycles. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, antitrust matters, and export controls remains a key risk factor for both hardware and software participants. Macroeconomic influences, including interest rate trajectories and corporate earnings growth, shape capital flows into technology equities. These developments create a supportive yet volatile environment for sector-specific ETFs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FTEC’s broader technology exposure has delivered participation across hardware and semiconductor strength, tempered by software volatility. IGV’s software concentration has produced differentiated returns tied more closely to enterprise spending trends and software-as-a-service adoption rates. During periods of sector rotation favoring mega-cap leaders, FTEC’s holdings in semiconductor and hardware names have influenced relative outcomes. IGV has shown sensitivity to software-specific catalysts such as earnings growth in cybersecurity and application platforms. Both ETFs exhibit elevated volatility characteristic of technology equities, with FTEC benefiting from greater diversification and IGV reflecting sharper thematic swings. Relative positioning hinges on investor views regarding the breadth of technology demand versus software-specific growth.

AI Screener

AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) on the basis of its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the information technology sector, and structural efficiency in capturing broad technology momentum. The ETF’s lower cost and wider holdings profile provide a more balanced risk exposure relative to the narrower, higher-cost software focus of the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). This assessment reflects observable factors including cost efficiency, diversification, and alignment with prevailing sector trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. IGV commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and IGV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21B vs. IGV (14.3B). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: FTEC (23.899) vs IGV (-3.048). FTEC was incepted earlier than IGV: FTEC (13 years) vs IGV (25 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IGV (0.39). IGV has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECIGVFTEC / IGV
Gain YTD23.899-3.048-784%
Net Assets21B14.3B147%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.3922%
Turnover9.0020.0045%
Yield0.370.022,085%
Fund Existence13 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECIGV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTYY8.980.07
+0.79%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF
REM22.050.03
+0.14%
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF
XMAR43.310.02
+0.05%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
QULL70.67N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
DON58.26N/A
N/A
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
-1.71%
ONTO - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
AMKR - FTEC
68%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
COHR - FTEC
66%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
VSH - FTEC
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
GLW - FTEC
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
More

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
-0.89%
CRM - IGV
74%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
ASAN - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
ESTC - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ZETA - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More