FTEC
Price
$277.95
Change
+$0.92 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jun 24, 11:35 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGV
Price
$87.32
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
13.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs IGV

FTEC vs IGV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC offers broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector across approximately 286 holdings, while IGV provides concentrated exposure to about 111 software and related companies.
  • FTEC's expense ratio of 0.08% is significantly lower than IGV's 0.39%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • Top holdings in FTEC emphasize semiconductors like NVDA (18.8%) and hardware leaders such as AAPL (14.3%), contrasting with IGV's software focus including ORCL (9.7%) and MSFT (8.2%).
  • FTEC's sector allocation is dominated by technology (98.5%), with subsector diversity in semiconductors and hardware; IGV is nearly pure software (application 58%, systems 38%).
  • FTEC delivers greater diversification and lower concentration risk, while IGV targets high-growth software subsector with higher volatility potential.
  • Both are passively managed, but FTEC's broader profile suits general tech exposure, whereas IGV appeals to thematic software bets.

Introduction

In today's market, technology sector ETFs like FTEC and IGV offer distinct pathways to capture growth in information technology. FTEC provides comprehensive exposure to the U.S. tech sector, encompassing hardware, semiconductors, and software. IGV, by contrast, delivers targeted access to North American software firms and select interactive media companies. Investors compare them to balance broad diversification against concentrated bets on software innovation, amid AI-driven capital flows and evolving sector rotation. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences, exposure profiles, and relative positioning to aid informed allocation decisions in a dynamic tech landscape.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. technology equities. It holds approximately 286 stocks, providing broad sector coverage. Top holdings as of late April 2026 include NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.9%), and MU (2.6%), comprising about 59% of assets.

Sector allocation is overwhelmingly technology at 98.5%, with minor exposures to communication services (0.5%), financial services (0.5%), and industrials (0.4%). Subsector breakdowns emphasize semiconductors (around 42%), software (23%), and communications equipment (19%). The expense ratio is a low 0.08%, and AUM exceeds $19 billion, supporting strong liquidity. As a non-diversified, market-cap-weighted ETF launched in 2013, FTEC rebalances in line with the index methodology, offering cost-effective, comprehensive tech sector exposure without leverage or active management.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is a passively managed ETF tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, focusing on U.S.- and Canadian-listed software companies plus select interactive home entertainment and media services firms. It maintains around 111 holdings for targeted subsector exposure. Top holdings as of early May 2026 feature ORCL (9.7%), MSFT (8.2%), PLTR (7.3%), CRM (6.3%), and PANW (6.3%), accounting for nearly 59% of the portfolio.

Allocations break down into application software (58%), systems software (38%), interactive home entertainment (3%), and interactive media (0.3%). The expense ratio stands at 0.39%, with AUM over $13 billion and robust liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01%). Launched in 2001 as a non-diversified, market-cap-weighted fund, IGV follows index rebalancing to emphasize software innovation, distinguishing it as a thematic play within technology.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, powering AI, cloud computing, and digital transformation, faces a landscape of surging capital expenditures (CapEx) from hyperscalers, projected to exceed $300 billion annually. Semiconductors and hardware benefit from AI infrastructure demand, while software firms navigate disruption from generative AI models. Regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and antitrust, alongside macroeconomic factors like interest rates and geopolitical tensions over chips, influences flows. Sector risks include valuation stretches and supply chain vulnerabilities, but catalysts like AI adoption and enterprise digitization sustain momentum across recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, FTEC has demonstrated resilience, buoyed by semiconductor strength in holdings like NVDA and AVGO, amid AI hardware demand and sector rotation toward infrastructure. IGV, more sensitive to software repricing amid AI disruption concerns, has shown higher volatility with underperformance in recent weeks relative to broader tech. FTEC's diversification across subsectors tempers drawdowns, while IGV's concentration amplifies swings tied to SaaS growth cycles and earnings from top software names. Both exhibit tech beta above 1.0, but FTEC's broader exposure aligns with sustained CapEx trends, positioning it favorably in risk-adjusted terms during macro shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Customizable filters span industry, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and hidden market opportunities. Explore the AI Screener today to streamline your research and identify high-potential ETF comparisons like FTEC and IGV.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (286 holdings), and balanced exposure across tech subsectors amid AI infrastructure momentum. While IGV offers compelling software purity, its higher costs and concentration elevate risk in volatile cycles. FTEC's structural advantages suggest a 65% probability of outperforming on a risk-adjusted basis over the next market cycle, absent major software rotations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. IGV commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and IGV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21.1B vs. IGV (13.4B). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: FTEC (23.560) vs IGV (-17.366). FTEC was incepted earlier than IGV: FTEC (13 years) vs IGV (25 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IGV (0.39). IGV has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECIGVFTEC / IGV
Gain YTD23.560-17.366-136%
Net Assets21.1B13.4B157%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.3922%
Turnover9.0020.0045%
Yield0.330.00-
Fund Existence13 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECIGV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTF27.140.10
+0.37%
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund
USEW55.45N/A
N/A
Cambria US EW ETF
BAPR52.80-0.35
-0.67%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr
RSMC28.57-0.32
-1.11%
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
EETH20.31-0.88
-4.16%
ProShares Ether ETF

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
+0.01%
CRM - IGV
75%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
CRWD - IGV
75%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
MSFT - IGV
72%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
ASAN - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
More