FTEC
Price
$277.03
Change
-$10.65 (-3.70%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
21.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XSD
Price
$603.65
Change
-$44.57 (-6.88%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
3.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs XSD

FTEC vs XSD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC offers broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector with 286 holdings, while XSD provides targeted, modified equal-weighted exposure to 44 semiconductor companies.
  • FTEC's expense ratio of 0.08% is significantly lower than XSD's 0.35%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • Top holdings in FTEC are dominated by mega-caps like NVDA (18.8%) and AAPL (14.3%), contrasting XSD's more balanced weights around 3-7% per holding, such as MaxLinear and INTC.
  • XSD exhibits higher concentration risk in semiconductors but potentially greater upside from subsector momentum; FTEC provides superior diversification across software, hardware, and services.
  • Both ETFs benefit from technology sector tailwinds, but FTEC's market-cap weighting aligns with broader sector rotation, while XSD's equal-weighting favors mid- and small-cap semis.
  • Liquidity is strong for both, with FTEC's larger AUM ($19B) supporting tighter spreads compared to XSD ($3B).

Introduction

In the current market environment, technology sector ETFs like FTEC and XSD offer compelling exposure to innovation-driven growth amid AI adoption and digital transformation. FTEC provides comprehensive coverage of the U.S. information technology sector, capturing leaders in software, hardware, and services. XSD, by contrast, delivers precise focus on semiconductors, a critical subsector powering AI chips, data centers, and computing advances. While they overlap in holdings like NVDA and AMD, FTEC suits investors seeking diversified tech exposure, whereas XSD appeals to those targeting semiconductor-specific catalysts. This comparison highlights their structural differences for informed allocation decisions in a sector commanding significant capital flows.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passive ETF tracking the MSCI USA IMI (Investable Market Index) Information Technology 25/50 Index, which includes large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. technology stocks. It holds approximately 286 securities, providing broad sector representation. Top holdings as of late April 2026 include NVDA (18.83%), AAPL (14.29%), MSFT (9.91%), AVGO (4.86%), and MU (2.64%), with the top 10 comprising about 59% of assets. Sector allocation is nearly 100% information technology, encompassing software/services (~50%), semiconductors (~30%), and hardware/equipment (~15%). The expense ratio is a low 0.084%, and the fund employs market-cap weighting with quarterly rebalancing (plus semiannual reviews) and 25/50 diversification caps to limit concentration. AUM stands at around $19 billion, supporting high liquidity with average daily volumes exceeding 400,000 shares.

State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) is a passive ETF tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, focusing on U.S. semiconductor firms across market caps. It maintains 44 holdings in a modified equal-weighted structure to ensure unconcentrated exposure. Recent top holdings include MaxLinear (7.41%), INTC (4.28%), SiTime (3.91%), AMD (3.65%), and MRVL (3.10%), with no single stock exceeding ~7%. Allocation is 100% semiconductors, spanning design, manufacturing, and equipment. The expense ratio is 0.35%, higher due to its niche focus. The index rebalances quarterly to maintain equal weighting, adjusted for liquidity and caps. AUM is approximately $3 billion, with solid liquidity reflected in a 0.13% median bid/ask spread and daily volumes around 30,000-50,000 shares.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid surging demand for AI infrastructure, cloud computing, and 5G/edge devices. Recent market cycles show robust capital flows into tech ETFs, with April 2026 inflows hitting records driven by semiconductor rallies. Global semiconductor sales reached $298.5 billion in Q1 2026, up 25% quarter-over-quarter, fueled by logic and memory chips. Macro drivers include lower interest rates supporting growth stocks, U.S.-China trade dynamics impacting supply chains, and regulatory pushes for domestic chip production via the CHIPS Act (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors). Risks encompass cyclical downturns, geopolitical tensions, and valuation stretches, yet AI catalysts like data center expansions sustain momentum across broad tech and semis.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have participated in tech's upswing, with semiconductors showing heightened volatility tied to AI hype and earnings cycles. FTEC's broader diversification has delivered steady gains, buoyed by mega-cap leaders amid sector rotation into growth. XSD, with its equal-weighting, has captured upside from mid-cap semis but exhibited sharper swings during profit-taking in names like INTC. Over recent market cycles, XSD has occasionally outperformed during semi-specific booms (e.g., memory recovery), while FTEC provides more consistent positioning amid interest rate shifts and broad tech momentum. Volatility profiles differ: FTEC's beta around 1.28 reflects market-like risk, versus XSD's elevated sensitivity to subsector news.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like technology and semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in ETF comparison and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC for its superior cost efficiency, extensive diversification, and alignment with sustained technology sector momentum. While XSD offers tactical appeal in semiconductor upcycles, FTEC's lower expense ratio, broader exposure, and reduced concentration risk position it as the structurally stronger choice with higher probability of consistent outperformance over market cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. XSD commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and XSD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21.1B vs. XSD (3.7B). XSD has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: XSD (87.876) vs FTEC (23.560). FTEC was incepted earlier than XSD: FTEC (13 years) vs XSD (20 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than XSD (0.35). XSD has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECXSDFTEC / XSD
Gain YTD23.56087.87627%
Net Assets21.1B3.7B571%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.3524%
Turnover9.0028.0032%
Yield0.330.13248%
Fund Existence13 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECXSD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XSD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUMV42.710.08
+0.19%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
GXLC91.20N/A
N/A
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
SPXE79.49-1.09
-1.35%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy
TSPY25.20-0.35
-1.37%
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Inc ETF
FV72.43-1.55
-2.10%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
-3.70%
NVDA - FTEC
76%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
LRCX - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
AVGO - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
CEVA - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
-6.09%
KLAC - FTEC
67%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More

XSD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSD has been closely correlated with MPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSD jumps, then MPWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XSD
1D Price
Change %
XSD100%
-6.88%
MPWR - XSD
82%
Closely correlated
-7.42%
SYNA - XSD
80%
Closely correlated
-6.52%
CEVA - XSD
79%
Closely correlated
-6.09%
ALGM - XSD
77%
Closely correlated
-9.84%
RMBS - XSD
73%
Closely correlated
-8.59%
More