FTGS vs MPWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGS is a Hold and MPWR is a Hold.
MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTGS | MPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OAKWX | 24.07 | -0.10 | -0.41% |
| Oakmark Global Select Investor | |||
| BSPAX | 704.07 | -12.20 | -1.70% |
| iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A | |||
| NDVCX | 16.41 | -0.35 | -2.09% |
| MFS New Discovery Value C | |||
| VPRSX | 16.25 | -0.47 | -2.81% |
| VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity R6 | |||
| TEPIX | 36.77 | -1.56 | -4.07% |
| ProFunds Technology UltraSector Inv | |||
FTGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTGS has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTGS jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTGS | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| KLAC - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| LRCX - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| AMAT - FTGS | 75% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| MPWR - FTGS | 74% Closely correlated | -4.16% | ||
| SNPS - FTGS | 72% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
More | ||||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | -4.16% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| QCOM - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 67% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| TOELY - MPWR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| VECO - MPWR | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||