Advertisement
LRCX vs MPWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LRCX delivered a YTD return of 61.31%, outperforming the S&P 500's 6.04%, fueled by AI-driven semiconductor equipment demand.
- MPWR leads with a stronger YTD gain of 75.57% and 1-year return of 155.05%, reflecting robust power management growth in enterprise data centers.
- Both stocks benefit from semiconductor sector momentum, but MPWR shows superior recent momentum amid AI infrastructure expansion, while LRCX offers relative valuation stability at a lower P/E ratio.
- Tickeron's Trending AI Robots feature bots trading both tickers in semiconductors, with annualized returns up to 94.80% for multi-ticker strategies including LRCX and MPWR.
- MPWR's Q1 revenue beat of $804 million underscores enterprise data demand, while LRCX benefits from etch/deposition leadership and recent earnings strength.
Introduction
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) are pivotal players in the semiconductor ecosystem, with LRCX specializing in wafer fabrication equipment like etch and deposition tools, and MPWR focusing on high-efficiency power management solutions. This stock comparison is relevant for traders eyeing AI infrastructure growth, data center expansions, and semiconductor relative performance. Investors tracking sector momentum, valuation trade-offs, and market positioning in recent market activity will gain insights into their contrasting growth drivers and risk profiles amid ongoing AI demand surges.
LRCX Overview and Recent Performance
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) designs, manufactures, and services semiconductor processing equipment, holding top market share in etch and a strong position in deposition for integrated circuit fabrication. The company serves major chipmakers like TSMC, Samsung, and Intel, with significant exposure to memory (DRAM, NAND) and logic chips. In recent market activity, LRCX shares have surged, posting a YTD return of 61.31% and a 1-year gain of 275.89%, far exceeding the S&P 500. Recent weeks saw strong upward momentum, with the stock clearing buy points on chip-gear investments and breaking above its 20-day moving average. Sentiment has been bolstered by earnings beats, AI-driven demand for advanced nodes, and analyst price target upgrades, though geopolitical export curbs to China introduce variability. Trading near $276 with a $345 billion market cap, LRCX reflects robust revenue growth amid capacity expansions.
MPWR Overview and Recent Performance
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) is a fabless semiconductor firm providing high-performance, energy-efficient power management integrated circuits for computing, automotive, industrial, communications, and consumer applications. Its solutions optimize power delivery in AI servers, data centers, and electric vehicles. Recent performance has been exceptional, with shares delivering a YTD return of 75.57% and 1-year return of 155.05%, outperforming broader indices. In recent weeks, volatility followed a Q1 earnings beat, with revenue of $804 million (up 26.1% YoY), prompting analyst upgrades and raised price targets. Positive sentiment stems from surging enterprise data and communications demand, though high valuations (P/E around 113) warrant caution. Trading near $1,588 with a $78 billion market cap, MPWR highlights its direct exposure to AI power needs.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most promising AI trading bots from its library of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong recent performance in current environments—like semiconductors and AI infrastructure—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Featured bots show annualized returns from 23% to 169%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70, often trading 1 to 18 tickers with durations from 1 day to 48 days. Examples include a semiconductor bot with LRCX, TER, and others at +94.80% annualized (63% win rate) and an MPWR-focused bot at +83.07% (68% win rate). These vary by momentum, sector rotation, and risk controls. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to today’s market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LRCX and MPWR both capitalize on AI tailwinds but differ in business models: LRCX’s capital equipment is cyclical, linked to foundry expansions, while MPWR’s fabless power ICs yield higher margins with direct hyperscaler exposure. Growth drivers include LRCX’s etch/deposition leadership versus MPWR’s AI server and EV demand. Recent momentum favors MPWR (75% YTD vs. 61%), but LRCX provides stability via lower P/E (48x vs. 113x). Risk factors: LRCX faces China export restrictions; MPWR risks valuation compression. Both share semiconductor exposure, yet MPWR edges in AI sentiment, trading off LRCX’s scale.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MPWR due to superior trend consistency, higher YTD momentum (75% vs. 61%), and catalysts in AI power delivery amid enterprise data growth. LRCX holds strong positioning with earnings stability and equipment demand, but recent relative underperformance introduces variability. This edge reflects probabilistic signals from observable factors like performance and sector bots, not certainties.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRCX is a StrongBuy and MPWR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LRCX’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMPWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- MPWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LRCX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LRCX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MPWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +11.11% price change this week, while MPWR (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +6.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +40.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +118.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +45.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
LRCX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MPWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+6.59% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+6.92% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| LRCX | MPWR | LRCX / MPWR | |
| Capitalization | 358B | 77.4B | 463% |
| EBITDA | 8.07B | 781M | 1,034% |
| Gain YTD | 67.580 | 74.225 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 54.16 | 112.81 | 48% |
| Revenue | 21.7B | 2.79B | 778% |
| Total Cash | 4.75B | 581M | 818% |
| Total Debt | 3.73B | 15.1M | 24,728% |
LRCX | MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LRCX's Valuation (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (84) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (17) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (47) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (4) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
MPWR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
| LRCX | MPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITOL | 27.00 | 0.47 | +1.76% |
| Tema International Durable Quality ETF | |||
| WANT | 47.24 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3X ETF | |||
| VGT | 109.50 | -0.06 | -0.05% |
| Vanguard Information Technology ETF | |||
| TOLZ | 60.26 | -0.62 | -1.03% |
| ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infras | |||
| IHE | 88.67 | -1.46 | -1.62% |
| iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | -4.62% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| NXPI - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | -4.39% | ||
| AMAT - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| KLIC - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | +4.73% | ||
More | ||||