KLAC
Price
$214.18
Change
-$4.55 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jul 24, 11:24 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
285.72B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPWR
Price
$1397.15
Change
-$1.30 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
68.64B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLAC vs MPWR

KLAC vs MPWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KLAC operates at the front end of chip manufacturing, providing essential process control and inspection equipment, while MPWR delivers power management solutions across a broad range of end markets.
  • KLAC benefits from superior scale, with full-year revenue of $12.16 billion and a net margin exceeding 35%, versus MPWR's $2.79 billion in revenue and a roughly 22.8% net margin.
  • MPWR has demonstrated faster percentage revenue growth — 26.4% year-over-year in 2025 — and is targeting 50% or more growth in its Enterprise Data segment for 2026.
  • KLAC carries significant exposure to China (approximately 30% of revenue), creating geopolitical risk related to export controls, whereas MPWR maintains a more geographically diversified end-market model.
  • KLAC trades at a lower P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple and offers higher risk-adjusted return metrics, while MPWR commands a premium valuation reflecting its faster growth trajectory.
  • Both companies are deeply levered to the multi-year artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, positioning them as compelling but structurally different semiconductor plays.

Introduction

Investors tracking the semiconductor sector face a persistent challenge: how to distinguish between companies that share exposure to artificial intelligence tailwinds but operate with fundamentally different business models, scale, and risk profiles. KLAC (KLA Corporation) and MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems) exemplify this dilemma. One is a dominant equipment supplier whose tools inspect and measure chips during fabrication; the other is a fabless designer of power management integrated circuits that go inside finished electronic systems. This comparison examines both stocks through the lens of recent financial performance, market positioning, growth catalysts, and risk factors — providing a structured framework for traders and investors evaluating these two semiconductor names side by side.

KLAC Overview and Recent Performance

KLAC (KLA Corporation), headquartered in Milpitas, California, is the world's leading provider of semiconductor process control and yield management systems. Its inspection and metrology tools are essential for detecting defects and measuring critical dimensions on silicon wafers — making the company indispensable to advanced logic, memory, and packaging fabs worldwide.

In recent quarters, KLAC has delivered standout financial results. For its fiscal year 2025 ended June 30, the company generated $12.16 billion in total revenue and GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income of $4.06 billion. Its Semiconductor Process Control segment — accounting for the vast majority of sales — grew revenue by approximately 24.7% year-over-year in the most recent reported quarter. Free cash flow surpassed $1 billion in a single quarter for the first time, a milestone that underscores the company's operational efficiency. Annualized revenue from advanced packaging products has reached roughly $850 million, reflecting rapid adoption tied to AI-related chip architectures.

However, sentiment has been tempered by several headwinds. China — which represents just under 30% of total revenue — has become a source of uncertainty as U.S. export controls restrict product and service deliveries to certain customers. Tariffs have also introduced an estimated 100-basis-point gross margin headwind. Management's guidance for the coming quarter pointed to flattish results, with revenue projected around $3.15 billion and non-GAAP EPS (earnings per share) of approximately $8.53, as the company navigates a shifting mix of foundry, logic, and memory demand. The stock has experienced some post-earnings pressure in recent weeks, reflecting the market's sensitivity to any deceleration in growth.

MPWR Overview and Recent Performance

MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems) is a fabless semiconductor company that designs and markets high-performance power management solutions. Its integrated circuits and modules convert and regulate electrical power across a wide range of applications — from cloud servers and AI accelerators to automotive ADAS (advanced driver-assistance systems), industrial equipment, and consumer devices. The company operates globally, with headquarters in Kirkland, Washington, and a corporate base in Schaffhausen, Switzerland.

Recent financial performance has been robust. For the full year 2025, MPWR reported revenue of $2.79 billion, representing a 26.4% increase from the prior year. Fourth-quarter revenue reached a record $751.2 million, up 20.8% year-over-year, while non-GAAP EPS for the quarter came in at $4.79. Crucially, the company's non-Enterprise Data end markets — including automotive, storage and computing, and industrial — grew by over 40% year-over-year, showcasing the strength of its diversified model.

One of the most closely watched dynamics for MPWR has been the trajectory of its Enterprise Data segment, which faced a pullback in the first half of 2025 amid shifting demand patterns from key customers. That segment returned to growth in the third quarter and management now expects Enterprise Data to grow at a floor of 50% in 2026, supported by new platform qualifications and design wins. The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 28% to $2.00 per share, signaling confidence in sustained cash flow generation. Still, shares have faced periodic volatility — the stock dropped sharply after its October 2025 earnings release despite beating estimates, a reminder that elevated expectations can cut both ways. The company is also navigating a strategic transition from chip-only sales to full silicon-based system solutions, which management believes will enhance long-term margins but introduces near-term execution complexity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's best-performing AI-powered trading bots, each designed to navigate evolving market conditions using distinct strategies, timeframes, and technical indicators. With hundreds of bots available — trading thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex — only those demonstrating the strongest real-time adaptability and performance consistency earn a spot in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles: some focus on short-term swing trades lasting a few days, while others execute longer-duration trend-following strategies over multiple weeks. Performance metrics vary, with select bots showcasing notable annualized returns, high trade accuracy rates, and robust risk-adjusted statistics that appeal to data-driven investors. Whether oriented toward momentum, mean reversion, or breakout patterns, each bot brings a unique analytical lens to the market. To explore which AI trading strategies are currently leading in today's environment, visit the Trending AI Robots page and see which bots align with your trading goals.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental distinction between these two companies lies in their position within the semiconductor value chain. KLAC sits at the front end of chip production — its customers are the foundries and memory makers that build fabs and purchase capital equipment in multi-year investment cycles. This makes KLAC a high-margin, cash-rich business (net margin of approximately 35.7%, return on equity exceeding 90%) but also one that is highly sensitive to wafer fab equipment (WFE) spending cycles and geopolitical restrictions on tool shipments.

MPWR, by contrast, operates downstream — its power management chips go into finished systems built by hyperscalers, automakers, and industrial OEMs (original equipment manufacturers). This provides more diversified demand drivers but also subjects the company to shorter order cycles, pricing pressure, and the need for continuous design wins. Its net margin of roughly 22.8% is healthy but structurally lower than KLAC's, reflecting the difference between a capital equipment monopoly-like business and a competitive chip design market.

On valuation, the contrast is stark. KLAC trades at a P/E ratio of roughly 43–65 (depending on the earnings basis), while MPWR commands a P/E multiple in the range of 83–99. This premium for MPWR reflects faster anticipated top-line growth — but it also means the stock is priced for near-flawless execution. Risk metrics further distinguish the two: KLAC has a lower beta (1.41 versus 1.71 for MPWR), indicating less sensitivity to broad market swings, and it also scores higher on risk-adjusted return measures such as the Sharpe and Sortino ratios over the trailing twelve months.

Geopolitical risk tilts heavily toward KLAC. With China accounting for approximately one-third of revenue and U.S. export controls tightening, the company faces a structural overhang that MPWR, with its more balanced geographic and end-market mix, largely avoids. On the other hand, MPWR's reliance on a handful of large Enterprise Data customers — particularly in the AI server supply chain — introduces its own form of concentration risk, as demonstrated by the volatility surrounding the NVIDIA-related demand shift in early 2025.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely lean toward KLAC in the current environment — though this preference is probabilistic rather than absolute. KLAC's higher net margins, superior return on equity, stronger free cash flow generation, lower valuation multiple, and better risk-adjusted return metrics (Sharpe and Sortino ratios) present a profile that systematic models tend to favor, particularly when market uncertainty is elevated. The company's entrenched competitive moat in process control — a segment where substitution is nearly impossible for advanced chip manufacturing — adds a layer of durability that AI-driven assessments typically weight positively.

That said, MPWR's faster revenue growth, expanding end-market diversification, and the potential for Enterprise Data re-acceleration in 2026 present a compelling growth narrative that should not be overlooked. The AI verdict would likely shift in MPWR's favor if trend-following signals strengthen and earnings momentum accelerates beyond current expectations. For now, the balance of stability, valuation discipline, and consistent execution gives KLAC a marginal edge in a data-driven, risk-aware comparison.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KLAC vs. MPWR commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLAC is a Hold and MPWR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (KLAC: $218.73 vs. MPWR: $1397.15)
Brand notoriety: KLAC: Notable vs. MPWR: Not notable
KLAC represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MPWR is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLAC: 49% vs. MPWR: 56%
Market capitalization -- KLAC: $285.72B vs. MPWR: $68.64B
KLAC [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $285.72B. MPWR’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $68.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $696.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $69.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $189.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMPWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KLAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MPWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KLAC and MPWR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MPWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPWR is a better buy in the short-term than KLAC.

Price Growth

KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while MPWR (@Semiconductors) price change was +7.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

KLAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

MPWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+1.11% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+3.43% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLAC($286B) has a higher market cap than MPWR($68.6B). MPWR has higher P/E ratio than KLAC: MPWR (100.01) vs KLAC (61.95). KLAC YTD gains are higher at: 84.973 vs. MPWR (54.693). KLAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.06B vs. MPWR (857M). MPWR has more cash in the bank: 932M vs. KLAC (613M). MPWR has less debt than KLAC: MPWR (20M) vs KLAC (6.15B). KLAC has higher revenues than MPWR: KLAC (13.1B) vs MPWR (2.96B).
KLACMPWRKLAC / MPWR
Capitalization286B68.6B417%
EBITDA6.06B857M707%
Gain YTD84.97354.693155%
P/E Ratio61.95100.0162%
Revenue13.1B2.96B443%
Total Cash613M932M66%
Total Debt6.15B20M30,725%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLAC vs MPWR: Fundamental Ratings
KLAC
MPWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6716
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2120
SMR RATING
1..100
1346
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
103
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPWR's Valuation (83) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (90) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

MPWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (21) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPWR (46) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPWR’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (44) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.

MPWR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (10) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLACMPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DETX3.31N/A
N/A
Liberty Defense Holdings Ltd
ACIW54.53-0.18
-0.33%
ACI Worldwide
RWAY5.47-0.03
-0.55%
Runway Growth Finance Corp
NGG82.37-1.50
-1.79%
National Grid PLC
STAA24.19-0.52
-2.10%
STAAR Surgical Company

MPWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPWR
1D Price
Change %
MPWR100%
-0.09%
KLAC - MPWR
74%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
LRCX - MPWR
73%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
NXPI - MPWR
73%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
AMAT - MPWR
70%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
KLIC - MPWR
70%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More