Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$14.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. GQSCX (2.28M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GQSCX (0.19). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. GQSCX (-4.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.58 vs. GQSCX (57.73).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.436 | 3.755 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 2.28M | 495,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.19 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -4.05 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.24 | 20.18 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.58 | 57.73 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement