Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$12.25
Change+$0.25 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. GQSCX (1.86M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs GQSCX (0.46). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (7 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. GQSCX (-15.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. GQSCX (59.12).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -15.071 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 1.86M | 496,996% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.46 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -15.81 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | -5.76 | -380% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | 59.12 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...