Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$11.92
Change-$0.85 (-6.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. GQSCX (1.99M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs GQSCX (0.46). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (7 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. GQSCX (-14.75). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. GQSCX (97.64).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -9.622 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 1.99M | 500,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.46 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -14.75 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -3.91 | -671% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 97.64 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers