Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$13.11
Change+$0.17 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and GQSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. GQSCX (2.01M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs GQSCX (0.48). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. GQSCX (-11.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. GQSCX (38.58).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -7.215 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 2.01M | 497,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.48 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -11.30 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 1.18 | 2,408% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 38.58 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement