Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
Glenmede Quant US Small Cap Equity
Price$14.39
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. GQSCX (2.27M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.95) vs GQSCX (0.64). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (13 years) vs GQSCX (7 years). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. GQSCX (7.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. GQSCX (31.75).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.227 | 1.768 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 2.27M | 467,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.64 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 7.62 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.29 | 6.32 | 511% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 31.75 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers