Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$13.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. GQSCX (2.16M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs GQSCX (0.46). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. GQSCX (-3.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. GQSCX (58.04).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -1.553 | -211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 2.16M | 495,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.46 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -3.94 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 20.13 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 58.04 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers