Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$14.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GQSCX (2.29M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GQSCX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.71 vs. GQSCX (-7.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. GQSCX (40.08).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | 4.382 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 2.29M | 472,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.29 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -7.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 11.49 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | 40.08 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement