Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.09
Change+$0.52 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$29.74
Change+$0.47 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets622.42M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.06B vs. LMASX (622M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LMASX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (39 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.12 vs. LMASX (-15.40). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.35 vs. LMASX (13.67).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.880 | -16.395 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 622M | 1,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.40 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -15.40 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | -18.79 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.35 | 13.67 | 624% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.85 | -15.35 | -488% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers