Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$31.93
Change+$0.64 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets654.65M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. LMASX (655M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LMASX (0.42). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (39 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. LMASX (-9.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. LMASX (14.02).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -10.626 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 655M | 1,481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.42 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -9.51 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | -5.25 | -646% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 14.02 | 694% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | -7.84 | -1,623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers