Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$37.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.44M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. LMASX (749M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LMASX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. LMASX (4.09). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. LMASX (19.79).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 5.798 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 749M | 1,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.36 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 4.09 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 17.00 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 19.79 | 524% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 13.15 | 1,358% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement