Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.08
Change+$1.13 (+2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.7B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$53.92
Change+$1.43 (+2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.51M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSCFX (253M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.14 vs. NSCFX (-19.96). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.88 vs. NSCFX (30.12).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.570 | 3.157 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 253M | 4,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.14 | -19.96 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.27 | 9.15 | 364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.88 | 30.12 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.71 | 27.73 | 554% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers