Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.19
Change-$0.19 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.69B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$50.99
Change-$0.43 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.07M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSCFX (238M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.15) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (12 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. NSCFX (-9.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.53 vs. NSCFX (39.44).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.315 | -1.626 | -265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 238M | 4,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.15 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | -9.81 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 10.27 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.53 | 39.44 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.10 | 25.84 | 577% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement