Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$46.97
Change-$3.01 (-6.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.22M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. NSCFX (228M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.18) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (12 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. NSCFX (-10.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. NSCFX (86.26).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -4.381 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 228M | 4,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -10.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -0.62 | -4,267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 86.26 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | 13.51 | 681% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers