Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.29
Change+$0.40 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$55.29
Change+$0.70 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.67M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSCFX (259M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. NSCFX (-12.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.41 vs. NSCFX (46.17).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.841 | 4.438 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 259M | 4,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | -12.31 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 25.87 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 46.17 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.35 | 34.14 | 502% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement