Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.24
Change+$1.01 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.57B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$49.10
Change+$1.27 (+2.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.32M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.57B vs. NSCFX (220M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.21) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (12 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. NSCFX (-12.22). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.07 vs. NSCFX (51.27).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.023 | -8.494 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.57B | 220M | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -12.22 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 2.64 | 1,065% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.07 | 51.27 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | 12.08 | 730% |