Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SAGWX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.57B
Touchstone Small Company A
Price$6.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SAGWX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SAGWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. SAGWX (1.21B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SAGWX: FTHFX (0.76) vs SAGWX (0.16). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SAGWX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SAGWX (32 years). SAGWX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SAGWX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. FTHFX (5.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.26 vs. SAGWX (51.25).
| FTHFX | SAGWX | FTHFX / SAGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.466 | 2.007 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.21B | 875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.16 | 473% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 6.27 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.57 | 32.83 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.26 | 51.25 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.71 | 6.27 | 2,389% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement