Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SAGWX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.75
Change+$0.41 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.18B
Touchstone Small Company A
Price$5.36
Change+$0.09 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SAGWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SAGWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. SAGWX (1.03B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SAGWX: FTHFX (0.82) vs SAGWX (0.17). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SAGWX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SAGWX (32 years). SAGWX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SAGWX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.73 vs. FTHFX (-8.97). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.43 vs. SAGWX (48.29).
| FTHFX | SAGWX | FTHFX / SAGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.184 | -11.873 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.18B | 1.03B | 894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.17 | 470% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | -5.73 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.34 | 2.31 | 926% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.43 | 48.29 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.65 | -9.61 | -798% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...