Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SAGWX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SAGWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. SAGWX (1.75B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SAGWX: FTHFX (0.56) vs SAGWX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SAGWX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SAGWX (34 years). SAGWX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SAGWX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. SAGWX (10.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. SAGWX (7.85).
| FTHFX | SAGWX | FTHFX / SAGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 15.484 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.75B | 693% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 10.66 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 40.36 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 7.85 | 776% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 49.11 | 483% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers