Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SAGWX
FTHFX vs SAGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SAGWX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SAGWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. SAGWX (1.84B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SAGWX: FTHFX (0.56) vs SAGWX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SAGWX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SAGWX (34 years). SAGWX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SAGWX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. SAGWX (21.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. SAGWX (13.49).
| FTHFX | SAGWX | FTHFX / SAGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 20.968 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.84B | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 21.36 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 47.31 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 13.49 | 499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 52.70 | 459% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement