Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.19
Change-$0.19 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.69B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$20.06
Change-$0.10 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets984.87M
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WHGSX (985M). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WHGSX (0.83) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGSX (18 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WHGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGSX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. WHGSX (-0.26). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.53 vs. WHGSX (40.76).
| FTHFX | WHGSX | FTHFX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.04 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.315 | -0.444 | -971% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 985M | 1,086% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | -0.26 | -2,694% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 8.47 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.53 | 40.76 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.10 | 55.58 | 268% |