Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.56
Change-$0.26 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$21.26
Change-$0.11 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WHGSX (1.03B). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WHGSX (0.83) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGSX (18 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WHGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGSX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. WHGSX (-1.97). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.44 vs. WHGSX (47.06).
| FTHFX | WHGSX | FTHFX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.04 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.687 | 5.531 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.03B | 1,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | -1.97 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.39 | 18.76 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.44 | 47.06 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.77 | 78.60 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement