Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSYX
FTHFX vs WWSYX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSYX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.14B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra
Price$21.11
Change-$0.18 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FTHFX vs WWSYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSYX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSYX (1.03B). WWSYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSYX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSYX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSYX (5 years). WWSYX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.84 vs. WWSYX (-2.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.82 vs. WWSYX (49.39).
| FTHFX | WWSYX | FTHFX / WWSYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.115 | 5.136 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.03B | 1,076% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.84 | -2.66 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.39 | 21.92 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.82 | 49.39 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.17 | N/A | - |