TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) operate within the energy services sector, focusing on oil and gas infrastructure and support services. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders and investors tracking oilfield dynamics, subsea technologies, and water management solutions amid fluctuating energy demand. With both companies exposed to upstream activities, understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles aids in assessing sector positioning and potential trade-offs in the current market environment.
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is a leading provider of technologies for oil and natural gas projects, operating through Subsea and Surface Technologies segments. The Subsea unit delivers systems for production, processing, and pipelines, while Surface Technologies supports drilling and wellhead operations globally. In recent weeks, FTI shares have surged toward their 52-week high of $76.12, propelled by strong subsea order backlog, solid Q4 2025 earnings with revenue of $2.52 billion, and a $2 billion share buyback announcement. Positive analyst coverage highlights elevated ROIC (return on invested capital) at 19.5% and anticipation for Q1 results, fostering improved market sentiment despite broader energy volatility.
TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) specializes in Completion Fluids & Products and Water & Flowback Services for oil and gas drilling, completion, and production. It supplies clear brine fluids and water management solutions across U.S. basins and international regions. Over recent market activity, TTI has exhibited momentum with a roughly 13% monthly gain, building on a one-year rally exceeding 260%, driven by Q4 2025 results showing revenue of $146.68 million and water recycling expansion. However, year-to-date returns remain modest at 4.06%, with upcoming earnings expected to reflect earnings pressure amid oilfield service dynamics.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of over 25 high-performing AI trading bots from its library of more than 350 bots that trade thousands of tickers across various assets. These bots are dynamically selected based on current market conditions, featuring diverse strategies like signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes and risk levels spanning low to high volatility. Performance metrics vary by bot, emphasizing outperformance potential through technical and fundamental analysis. Traders can explore these top performers tailored to today’s environment—visit the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate options suited to your trading style.
FTI and TTI both serve the energy sector but diverge in business models: FTI emphasizes integrated subsea and surface technologies for deepwater projects, while TTI focuses on niche completion fluids and onshore water management. Growth drivers contrast with FTI's offshore backlog expansion versus TTI's scaling in frac flowback and recycling services. Recent momentum favors FTI's consistent uptrend and lower P/E of 32.66 compared to TTI's 325, though TTI shows sharper short-term gains. Risk profiles differ markedly—FTI's beta of 0.71 signals stability, against TTI's 1.23—while market sentiment reflects optimism for subsea demand and water solutions amid energy recovery.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor FTI over TTI, citing greater trend consistency, lower volatility, substantial subsea catalysts, and superior year-to-date relative performance in recent market positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.94% price change this week, while TTI (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +11.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +127.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.
FTI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
TTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+3.46% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| FTI | TTI | FTI / TTI | |
| Capitalization | 28.2B | 1.54B | 1,835% |
| EBITDA | 1.91B | 86M | 2,226% |
| Gain YTD | 59.098 | 10.993 | 538% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.12 | 173.33 | 16% |
| Revenue | 10.2B | 630M | 1,619% |
| Total Cash | 961M | 35.5M | 2,707% |
| Total Debt | 1.3B | 224M | 582% |
FTI | TTI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTI's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as TTI (92) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to TTI’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as TTI (33) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to TTI’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTI (90) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTI’s over the last 12 months.
TTI's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (40) in the null industry. This means that TTI’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.
TTI's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (20) in the null industry. This means that TTI’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.
| FTI | TTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 66% | 27 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been loosely correlated with TTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then TTI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTI has been closely correlated with WTTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTI jumps, then WTTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTI | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| WTTR - TTI | 68% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| LBRT - TTI | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| HAL - TTI | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| AROC - TTI | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| FTI - TTI | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||