Ad is loading...
FTINX vs HBLCX
FTINX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTINX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% I
Price$12.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.14B
FTINX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTINX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTINX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FTINX (1.99B). FTINX (2.72) and HBLCX (2.65) have matching dividends . FTINX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTINX (17 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTINX (22.00). FTINX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTINX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTINX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTINX (500). FTINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. HBLCX (5.15). FTINX return over 5 years is better than : 16.77 vs. HBLCX (5.90).
| FTINX | HBLCX | FTINX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.352 | 2.083 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 12.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 5.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | -0.94 | -410% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.77 | 5.90 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.32 | 25.81 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers