Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMSX vs NAESX
FTMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FTMSX vs NAESX
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$27.68
Change+$0.13 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.81M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FTMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FTMSX (22.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: NAESX (1.20) vs FTMSX (0.12). FTMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FTMSX (7 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: NAESX (3000) vs FTMSX (100000). FTMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.50 vs. NAESX (9.72). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.30 vs. FTMSX (54.85).
| FTMSX | NAESX | FTMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.17 | 782% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.17 | 994% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.569 | 6.425 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.20 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 9.72 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 38.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.85 | 67.30 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement