Ad is loading...
FTMSX vs VSCPX
FTMSX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTMSX vs VSCPX
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$20.51
Change+$1.89 (+10.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.06M
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$280.59
Change-$12.51 (-4.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FTMSX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMSX vs. VSCPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMSX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FTMSX (15.1M). VSCPX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: VSCPX (1.54) vs FTMSX (0.15). FTMSX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: FTMSX (6 years) vs VSCPX (14 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. VSCPX (12.00). FTMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: FTMSX (100000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.67 vs. FTMSX (-25.34). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.57 vs. FTMSX (39.03).
| FTMSX | VSCPX | FTMSX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.03 | 4,433% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.03 | 5,633% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.678 | -19.287 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.54 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.34 | -13.67 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.53 | -5.10 | 775% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 56.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...