Advertisement
FTNT vs SABR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTNT is a Hold and SABR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSABR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FTNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SABR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SABR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SABR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
SABR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
| FTNT | SABR | FTNT / SABR | |
| Capitalization | 57B | 744M | 7,661% |
| EBITDA | 2.38B | 406M | 587% |
| Gain YTD | -21.264 | -48.356 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.64 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.14B | 3.02B | 203% |
| Total Cash | 4.78B | 651M | 734% |
| Total Debt | 995M | 5.12B | 19% |
FTNT | SABR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 18 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SABR's Valuation (27) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTNT (84) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that SABR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SABR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SABR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (11) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SABR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than SABR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as SABR (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to SABR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as SABR (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to SABR’s over the last 12 months.
| FTNT | SABR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 19 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
FTNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CRM - FTNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| HUBS - FTNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
More | ||||
SABR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SABR has been loosely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SABR jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SABR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SABR | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| RAMP - SABR | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| CPAY - SABR | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| FTNT - SABR | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| MSFT - SABR | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| NTCT - SABR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||