FTW
Price
$11.39
Change
+$0.04 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
337.74M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PED
Price
$10.81
Change
+$0.45 (+4.34%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
143.67M
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTW vs PED

FTW vs PED Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTW vs. PED commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTW is a Hold and PED is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FTW: $11.39 vs. PED: $10.81)
Brand notoriety: FTW and PED are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTW: 86% vs. PED: 33%
Market capitalization -- FTW: $337.74M vs. PED: $143.67M
FTW [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $337.74M. PED’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $143.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $146.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PED is a better buy in the long-term than FTW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTW is a better buy in the short-term than PED.

Price Growth

FTW (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.69% price change this week, while PED (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTW is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

PED is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.88% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTW($338M) has a higher market cap than PED($144M). FTW has higher P/E ratio than PED: FTW (30.52) vs PED (7.39). FTW YTD gains are higher at: 9.612 vs. PED (-3.465). FTW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.7M vs. PED (1.69M). FTW has more cash in the bank: 20.7M vs. PED (7.7M). PED has less debt than FTW: PED (98.2M) vs FTW (305M). FTW has higher revenues than PED: FTW (188M) vs PED (77.2M).
FTWPEDFTW / PED
Capitalization338M144M235%
EBITDA68.7M1.69M4,072%
Gain YTD9.612-3.465-277%
P/E Ratio30.527.39413%
Revenue188M77.2M244%
Total Cash20.7M7.7M269%
Total Debt305M98.2M311%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTW vs PED: Fundamental Ratings
FTW
PED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5177
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PED's Valuation (20) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTW (66) in the null industry. This means that PED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTW’s over the last 12 months.

PED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTW (100) in the null industry. This means that PED’s stock grew similarly to FTW’s over the last 12 months.

PED's SMR Rating (97) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTW (100) in the null industry. This means that PED’s stock grew similarly to FTW’s over the last 12 months.

FTW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PED (77) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTW’s stock grew similarly to PED’s over the last 12 months.

FTW's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PED (99) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTWPED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
32%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCLTX62.760.40
+0.64%
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
MYICX11.420.06
+0.53%
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl C
JADGX79.31N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Growth And Income S
MCVCX10.38-0.03
-0.29%
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps C
RYCPX64.66-0.53
-0.81%
Rydex Consumer Products C

FTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTW and INDO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTW and INDO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTW
1D Price
Change %
FTW100%
+0.35%
INDO - FTW
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
PED - FTW
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.34%
VOC - FTW
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
IGACU - FTW
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SM - FTW
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More