FTXL vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTXL is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTXL | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PEEAX | 15.84 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth A | |||
| LMRNX | 32.33 | -0.13 | -0.40% |
| 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I | |||
| BGPKX | 12.92 | -0.06 | -0.46% |
| Baillie Gifford Developed EAFE All Cap K | |||
| PFPGX | 27.02 | -0.14 | -0.52% |
| Parnassus Growth Equity Institutional | |||
| JGVVX | 44.36 | -0.26 | -0.58% |
| JPMorgan Growth Advantage R6 | |||
FTXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTXL | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| KLAC - FTXL | 91% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - FTXL | 91% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| AMAT - FTXL | 89% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| QCOM - FTXL | 86% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| TER - FTXL | 85% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 93% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 92% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| VECO - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| ONTO - KLAC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||